Links :

   site sponsors       

 

    NVIDIA GeForceFX 5600 Ultra (Reference)

Product :

GeForce FX 5900 Ultra

Manufacturer :

NVIDIA

Reviewed by :

Wayne Brooker

Price :

N/A

Date :

June 24th, 2003.

 

   Page No:   3
              Move to Page :   

 
 

 

Installation

Hardware installation is no easier and no harder than it would be with any other graphics card you can buy other than you'll need a spare 4 pin Molex from your power supply and you'll need it to reach your card.

Installing NVIDIA's drivers has, with one or two minor exceptions, always been a simple task. They unusually install in a single, simple operation and work without any swearing or fiddling which is a major plus to me, I have better things to do than mess about trying to decode randomly generated error messages.

Before I get on to the testing, and to avoid any of the wonderfully detailed emails I received after my last review from people who hadn't got the grasp of the driver settings I'd adopted, let's go over them.

Driver Settings

First the Mipmap detail level (below). This was set for "Best Image Quality" and it stayed there throughout. I don't like the image that's rendered with this set to "Best Performance", not only because it's ugly but also because it has no comparable setting in the competitor's drivers so far as I can see. To those who say the difference in image quality is minimal in all cases I say wipe the Arctic Silver off your spectacles and take another look!

The appearance of the "More Direct3D" button is due to the addition of "Coolbits" to the registry which allows V-Sync to be set, a feature that really should be part of the default drivers by now.

Self explanatory? Bottom two sliders were adjusted as required while the top one stayed put.

In both OpenGL and Direct3D V-Sync is always set to "Off".

 

Okay, so what I'm saying is you might see better figures than this if a site uses the "Best Performance" Mipmap detail level but in a lot of cases the performance increases isn't great. Unfortunately in some cases (like in Unreal Tournament) the difference can also be fairly substantial.

Test Setup

Every other review has put the 5600 Ultra up against a Radeon 9500 or 9600 so while I didn't have one here (jeez will nobody work with us :) I eventually decided not to get one in just for the sake of this review. Not only does this save all the driver speculation it also gives us chance to see how the FX fits in to the NVIDIA range that preceded it.

We figured it was a bit unfair to run a midrange card on a Barton 3200+ or P4 3.0 so we packed them away and dug out a trusty AthlonXP 2200+. Also back in the drawer went the dual channel nForce2 board and in its place we bolted in a KT400 powered Albatron KX400-8X. For the Ti4200 part we chose one of the breed of "super cards" from Albatron that was built on a Ti4600 PCB with faster memory onboard. The other specs looked like this:

256MB Corsair XMS3200
Maxtor 80GB HDD (7200RPM, ATA-133)
GeForce4 Ti4600 (reference)
Albatron GeForce4 Ti4200P-Turbo (250/550 core/memory)

To the benchmarks:

 


Home

Website is designed by Mohsin Ali. All graphics is (C) Shapps Technologies 2001-2002.