Contact The Author
Martyn

Review Related Links

Current Pricing

 

AMD Athlon 1.33
Author : Martyn Date : 2nd October 2001

3DVelocity would like to thank AMD UK and especially Theresa Zimmer for their help and courtesy in providing this CPU for review.

 

Part Three: The Test Setup

Having been using the 1Ghz Athlon chip for sometime now I was keen to dicover what kind of performance was available from this near top clock-speed chip.

The testbed was based upon these specifications:-

The chip in question (1.33Ghz Athlon 266fsb type 'C')
Iwill KK266+R SDR motherboard.
256MB Crucial PC133 Cas 2 Memory (One stick).
ATI 64MB Radeon VIVO (Retail)
AMD Approved 300w Power Supply
45GB IBM 75gxp ATA 100 Hard drive
Cyberdrive 16x12x40 CDR/W
Taisol AMD Approved HSF (Temps read with Via Hardware Monitor @ 30 idle / 38 load)
Windows 98 OS.

 

Part Four: 3D Performance.

The Athlon / Duron based systems have really become the 'gamers choice' of late, let's see what this speedy chip can achieve as we test it in two very popular benchmarks.
Firstly Madonion.com's 3Dmark 2001 for DX 8 performance and ID's popular first person shooter, Quake 3 Arena for Open GL.

3DMark 2001

3DMark2001
640 x 480
16bit
800 x 600
16bit
1024 x 768
32bit
1600 x 1200 32bit
Athlon 1.33
4500
4154
3414
2116

(Results expressed in '3DMarks')

The processor performed amazingly well in this tough 3D benchmark, for its price bracket on the market the Athlon is again showing it is not only a high-end solution but also a true value solution too. It complemented the Radeon well and some huge frame rates where obtained particularly in the 'Dragothic' game test and the 'Lobby' game test. Gamers needn't worry about the longevity of the chip, in today's fast paced market it will stand the test of time quite well and when the time comes to upgrade you will surely appreciate the low price of these chips.

Lets move on to Quake 3 to see if the Athlon has and trouble with Open GL.

Quake 3 Arena
640 x 480
16bit
800 x 600
16bit
1024 x 768
32bit
1600 x 1200 32bit
Athlon 1.33
132.8
118.2
80.5
41.1

(Results expressed in frames-per-second)

The Radeon based GPU's have never been quite as quick as the equivalent nVidia based offerings but nevertheless the CPU pushed the card all the way. Even with full details and high quality textures enabled at 1600 x 1200 the card and chip combo retained fully playable framerates while still looking absolutely fantastic. If you are a demanding gamer then one thing is for sure; one of the higher frequency Athlon chips will not disappoint.

Lets move on to page three where the Athlon comes up against some complex calculations.

Page Three

>>>

 

 

Home