|
AMD's
Athlon XP 2600+: AMD Bites Back
|
|
Author
: Martyn Date : 21st
August 2002
|

3DVelocity wish to thank AMD
for providing this CPU for our review.
| ...Product |
Athlon
XP 2600+ |
| ...Manufacturer |
AMD |
| ...Supplier |
AMD |
| ...Price |
TBC |

Part Four: The Test Setup
Intel Test Bed: -
Intel's
2.53GHz Pentium 4
Abit's
TH7II [i850]
4 x Kingston
128MB PC800 RIMMS
Albatron's Geforce 4 Ti 4600 (28.32 Det)
IBM's
75GXP ATA 100
550w Intel/AMD Approved PSU.
AMD Test Bed:-
AMD's
Athlon XP 2100+ (1.73GHz), AMD's 2600+ (2.13GHz)
Epox's
8K3a+ [VIA KT333 CE]
Abit's AT7 MAX [VIA
KT333 CE]
2 x TwinMos PC2700 DDR 256MB
Albatron's Geforce 4 Ti 4600 (28.32 Det)
IBM's
75GXP ATA 100
550w Intel/AMD Approved PSU.
Windows XP Pro.
Benchmarks
|
Benchmark
|
Optimisation
/ Explination
|
|
SiSoftware
Sandra 2002 V.2002.1.8.59
|
CPU,
Multi-Media & Memory Performance
|
|
PCMark 2002
|
System
Performance: Memory & CPU
|
|
Quake 3
Arena Time Demo 1 V.1.1
|
Open
GL Gaming
|
|
Jedi Knight II: Jedi Outcast
V.1.03
|
Open
GL Gaming
|
|
3DMark 2000 v.1.1
|
Direct
3D DX7
|
|
3DMark 2001 'SE'
|
Direct
3D DX8.1
|

Notes:
Although some would suggest a P4 DDR based
setup would be 'fairer' what we hope to show is the top
performance offered by both companies, if the CPU's are
the fastest we feel the whole system should represent
the best available and right now Rambus still holds a
big lead over DDR in terms of benchmark scores. This should
clearly be taken into consideration when evaluating the
results.
Also because of the lateness of our sample
two different mainboards are used, this will surely affect
memory scores slightly although all comparable settings
were used.
<<<
Back to Review Index | Sandra
>>>
Home