To get a feel for the general performance levels
I ran the memory at 333MHz on our Epox 8K3A+ and compared them
to those of Corsair's XMS3200 CAS2. As expected results were
pretty much identical, certainly well within the margin for
error.
Corsair XMS3200 CAS2
Corsair XMS3500 CAS2
SiSoft Sandra Cache and Memory Benchmark :
Corsair XMS3200 CAS2
Corsair XMS3500 CAS2
HotCPU Tester Pro :
Hot
CPU Tester Pro is a system health and stability tester.
It tests CPU, and virtually all parts of motherboard for errors/bugs
and defective parts. It is a burn-in test with uniquely designed
state of the art DefectTech engine. DefectTech is a technology
developed by 7Byte Computers to diagnostic systems regarding
its stability and in general computer's health. Hot CPU Tester
is currently being used in many labs and governmental organizations
around the world, as a reliable diagnostic and trouble shooting
program. In this instance I only ran the benchmark portion of
the software to draw a comparison. Again we see near identical
results for both the XMS3200 and XMS3500.
Corsair XMS3200 CAS2
Corsair XMS3500 CAS2
ScienceMark2 :
We made regular use of the original ScienceMark
for general system and particularly CPU performance tests and
version 2 maintains that tradition and even adds to it. Along
with bug fixes, a new interface and new tests comes a quick
and effective memory benchmark. Here we see that memory latency
does record very slightly lower for the XMS3500 but not really
by enough to draw any conclusions.
Corsair XMS3200 CAS2
Corsair XMS3500 CAS2
3DMark2001 SE (1024x768) :
3DMark®2001
SE (build 330) is the latest installment in the popular
3DMark series. By combining DirectX®8.1 support with completely
new graphics, it continues to provide benchmark results that
empower you to make informed hardware assessments. That's MadOnion.com's
spin on it, no doubt you have a view of your own
