|
Fujitsu
DynaMo 1300SF Review
|
|
Author
: Wayne : 29th August 2001
|
3DVelocity would like to thank
Fujitsu and
especially Mike Bain for their help and courtesy in providing
this unit for review.

Introduction :
If there's one thing the
PC doesn't lack it's data storage options. From Zip to LS120
disks, solid state USB storage, CD-RW, Tape and of course the
humble hard disk, it would appear that the data storage field
is pretty much covered, so why bother with the relatively expensive
option of using magneto-optical storage? Well, despite its cost,
magneto-optical storage does offer advantages you'll not find
on any of these other drives, but whether or not that justifies
the price premium is something I want to look at today.
The 1300SF was until recently
Fujitsu's largest capacity magneto-optical drive (MO as we'll
call it from here on) to date boasting an impressive 1.3GB of
storage space. It is also backward compatible with ISO compliant
3.5" capacities of 640MB, 540MB, 230MB and 128MB.
Benefits :
To understand the benefits
of MO drives we need to understand a little bit about how they
work. Unlike conventional magnetic or optical media, a MO drive
uses a combination of magnetic and laser technology to write
to a disk. Conventional magnetic drives are not able to produce
magnetic field that is focused tightly enough to pack in the
levels of data required by modern demands, plus it is also very
sensitive to the effects of external magnetic fields that have
to potential to corrupt the data that has been written. In addition
to this, conventional optical media such as CD-RW is known to
deteriorate over time and was too unreliable at the write stage
to be considered a sound option for many companies looking to
archive massive amounts of data. The way to overcome both these
problems is with MO technology.
In a nutshell, a magneto-optical
disk consists of four layers, though as with photographic film
individual manufacturers often add additional layers in an attempt
to improve performance and reliability, but for now let's concentrate
on the four key layers. Front and back are the conventional
plastic protective layers, but sandwiched between these are
an alloy and an Aluminium layer. The purpose of the Aluminium
layer is simply to act as a mirror, reflecting the light from
the laser back towards a light sensitive pickup, while the alloy
layer that sits on top of this is a crystalline substance that's
little more than a few atoms thick. This crystalline layer has
the ability to polarise light provided its crystals are magnetically
aligned, but in order to align these crystals it must first
be heated to a critical point known as its "Curie Point"
(around 180 to 200 Celsius). Because only the crystals that
have been heated to this critical point can be aligned by the
MO drive's magnetic head, the density of the data on the disk
is a function of the laser's ability and not the magnetic head's.
Once cooled again, the crystals become locked in their new alignment
and are impervious to external or internal magnetic fields until
heated again.
The reading of the disks is performed by a much lower powered
laser that picks up the state of polarisation without reheating
the alloy.
In order to be able to read
and write earlier, lower capacity disks, Fujitsu developed a
technology known as MSR (Magnetically Induced Super Resolution)
which incorporates IRISTER, or Iris Thermal Eclipse
Reading. This works much the same way as the aperture control
in a camera, narrowing the laser spot for 1.3GB disks while
opening up and using a larger spot for lower capacity disks.

So the key advantage to
MO disks is stability. These disks are resistant to things such
as shock, vibration, moisture, dust, and magnetic fields and
as such are used world-wide for archiving critical data. In
fact such is the reliability of MO technology, you'll find it
in use with the FBI for storing fingerprint files, with hospitals
for patient records and even with NASA for mission details.
Factor in the fact that you can write to a MO disk around 100,000,000
(one hundred million) times, and that they have a shelf life
believed to be between 50 and 100 years and you have a rock
solid data storage solution that you know you can rely on.
Before we take a closer
look, let's check out the specs.

Specifications :
|
|
DynaMO
1300SF Capacities
|
|
Disk
format
|
ISO
10090
|
ISO
13963
|
ISO
15041
|
GIGAMO
|
|
Storage
capacity
|
128MB
|
230MB
|
538MB
|
643MB
|
1283MB
|
|
Sector
size
|
512
byte
|
512
byte
|
512
byte
|
2,048
byte
|
2,048
byte
|
|
DynaMO
1300SF Specs |
| Model
number |
MDG3130SS |
| Disk
format |
ISO
10090 |
ISO
13963 |
ISO
15041 |
GIGAMO |
| Random
seek time |
23
ms |
| Average
latency time |
6.6
ms |
9.3
ms |
| Rotational
speed |
4,500
RPM |
3,214
RPM |
| Recording
density (BPI) |
24,400 |
29,300 |
52,900 |
89,100 |
| Track
density (TPI) |
15,875 |
18,275 |
23,090 |
28,200 |
| Data
transfer rate |
Drive |
1.37
MB/s |
1.65-2.65
MB/s |
2.98-4.96
MB/s |
3.46-5.92
MB/s |
| SCSI-2
Interface |
5
MB/s (async)
20 MB/s (sync) |
| Recording
code |
2-7
RLL |
1-7
RLL |
| Interface |
Ultra
SCSI |
| Average
load time |
8
sec. |
12
sec. |
| Average
unload time |
4
sec. |
| Buffer
size |
2
MB |
| MTBF |
120,000
hours |
| Component
life |
5
years |
| Warranty |
1
year |
|
DynaMO
1300SF Physical Specs |
| Power
requirement |
100
- 240 VAC |
| Power
consumption |
Operating |
15.0
W |
| Sleep
mode |
6.5
W |
| Dimension
(H x W x D) |
33.5
x 122 x 224 mm |
| Weight |
1.0
kg |
| Ambient
temperature |
Operating |
5ºC
- 45ºC |
| Non-Operating |
0ºC
- 50ºC |
| Relative
humidity |
10
- 85% (non-condensing) |
| Vibration |
Operating |
0.4
G (5 - 500Hz) |
| Non-Operating |
1.0
G (5 - 500Hz) |
| Shock |
Operating |
2.0
G (5 ms) |
| Non-Operating |
50
G (5 ms) |
| Altitude |
Operating |
3,000
m |
| Non-Operating |
12,000
m |
The Drive :
Styling
of the 1300SF is probably best described as "retro".
Its ribbed Aluminium look outer casing reminds me of those American
diners you so often see, while its smoked translucent sides
and combination of slab-like lines and unexciting curves make
it something you'll either love or hate. For the record I fall
into the latter category but I'm sure there are plenty who'll
find its styling exciting and refreshing. The front panel consists
of nothing more than the loading slot, a power status LED, and
eject button and a hole for the emergency eject function as
found on almost all CD-ROM drives. On the bottom you'll find
nothing more than the label, four minimalist rubber feet and
a recessed power socket. The drive is also surprisingly heavy
too tipping the scales at 1Kg
.
Loading the disk works in
the same way as loading a floppy disk, though you have to push
quite hard before it "clunks" in to place, not exactly
an illusion of elegance to this side of things. Fortunately
it's a powered eject which reminds you that you're not using
a 30 year old peripheral.
A look at the back of the
drive reminds us that you have the useful ability to connect
using either USB which offers a meagre 1.2MB/S, or Ultra SCSI
which offers a theoretical maximum of 20MB/S, either way the
drive tops out at 5.92 MB/s so though this is beyond the scope
of the poor old USB port, it's well within the Ultra SCSI ceiling.
On the back of the drive are the power button, a bank of DIP
switches and a SCSI ID selector in addition to the two SCSI
connectors.

Fujitsu
recommend the DIP switches remain at their default settings,
but should you desire you are able to alter various settings
such as Write Cache and Auto Spindle Stop.
The disks themselves are
90mm (3.5"), 1.3GB magneto optical and are a break from
the conventional 5.25" platters that have been fairly universal
up until now. As with the humble floppy, they are encased in
plastic to prevent dust etc. Prices for new disks seemed to
vary quite a bit, but the average was around $100 (£72)
for a pack of five which I consider quite reasonable.

As you'd expect, there's
an activity LED on the SCSI connector so you know when the drive's
busy, but considering it may well be tucked under or on a shelf
or monitor, I'd have sooner seen a front facing LED used too.

Page2 Testing and Conclusion