3DVelocity would
like to thank Bacata,
France and especially Jean-Christophe Agobert for their
help and courtesy in providing this HSF for review.
Fitting :
Once you've mastered the
clip, fitting is fairly straight forward. The 294s dimensions
(61 x 69 x 61 mm) make it sutable for just about any motherboard
on the market, no matter how tight the socket is, and though
its weight is a worry at 442g, the new retaining clip makes
this less of a problem than it was on the 238. The supplied
shroud need only be fitted with the fan in the exhaust position
in theory (blowing out of the top), though in testing it made
very little difference one way or the other.
Prior to fitting, it's
important that you wipe the base of the 294M to remove all
traces of the protective oil. After applying your favoutite
Thermal grease (none is supplied) and swearing a few times
at the clip, you're ready to plug in the fan and go. While
we're on the subject of the base, I should comment that it
is very flat and has a qood quality finish.

Testing :
Test System :
AMD Athlon 1000 @ 1104
(138x8)
ATi Radeon 64MB DDR VIVO Retail
SBLive 1024
DFI AK76-SN Motherboard
256MB Crucial PC2100 DDR
Arctic Silver (original) TIM
All readings were taken
using the motherboard's thermistor, so while not degree accurate,
any inaccuracies will be duplicated for each heatsink tested.
Room temperature :
23 Celsius
Case Temperature : 26 Celsius
The assembly instructions
clearly show the fan fitted in the exhaust position, but the
table below clearly illustrates that doing this lowers performance
significantly. The most efficient configuration is when the
fan is used in the intake orientation (drawing air in from
the top) and with the shroud removed.
|
|
|
|
|
| Idle |
Stressed |
Idle |
Stressed |
Idle |
Stressed |
Idle |
Stressed |
| 39 |
48 |
40 |
49 |
37 |
46 |
37 |
45 |
Here's how this stack up against the
competition.

| |
Idle
|
Stressed
|
| Swiftech MCX370-0A |
32
|
38
|
| Thermaltake Super
Orb |
38
|
46
|
| Alpha PEP36T |
38
|
44
|
| Zalman CNPS5000+ |
35
|
41
|
| Kanie Hedgehog
294M |
37
|
45
|
| Kanie Hedgehog 238M |
37
|
46
|
| Thermosonic ThermoEngine
(36CFM fan) |
35
|
41
|
Conclusion :
Pros
Good base flatness and finish
Well built with look of quality
Quiet fan
Secure retaining clip
Good price for this class of cooler
RPM monitoring
Cons
Average cooling
Underpowered fan
Retaining clip is fiddly
Weight
Kanie claim their new
design offers a 10% improvement over the 238M, though in reality
we saw only a 1 degree (approx 2%) improvement. This gives
rise to the questions of construction. As with the 238M the
cooling pins are pressed into the base then clamped or crimped.
One reason given for the varying performance levels of the
original Hedgehog was that gaps were sometimes visible between
the pins and base that could interfere with thermal conduction.
With only one unit to test I can't confirm one way or the
other if this was the case with the 294M, or if this was the
factor that stopped it scoring better than it did against
the 238M, or indeed against the other coolers we tested.
Certainly a big factor
in its very average performance is the 24CFM fan. Show me
a top 5 rated cooler with a 24CFM fan and I'll show you a
cooler that defies the laws of physics. Air flow is critical
in HSF design, and the 294M doesn't have it, at least not
in this configuration.
Despite all this, the
294M isn't a bad cooler, it's just not a great one. The look,
feel and quality still make this a desirable piece of kit,
and coupled with a high performance fan it's worthy of the
overclocker's attentions, though for the hardcore overclocker
looking for that last Megahert it's possibly not the best
choice at the moment. The weight is something many may feel
uncomfortable with, and it's certainly way beyond AMD's upper
weight limit, but I've never heard of anyone having problems
with a Hedgehog that were in any way related to its weight,
and the three lug clip should make moving your PC with the
294 installed less of a risk, though I personally wouldn't.
It'll be interesting to
see if other sites score better results than I have thus confirmimg
the construction variation theory. At £35.19 (inc. VAT
from Overclock.co.uk)
or £38.19 (with Delta fan) for a solid Copper cooler,
the price can't be argued with. It's not cheap, but it's certainly
cheaper than other similar sized and equally well built Copper
coolers. I guess it all depends if you're looking for that
extra degree of cooling or the Kudos of solid Copper.
