|
Nanotherm
Silver XTC Thermal Grease
|
|
Author : Wayne
Date : 14th November 2002
|
Performance :
Before we look at the performance of Nanother
Silver and Nanotherm EXP there are a couple of points I want
to mention that explain why you may not see the same results
we have. The whole point of a thermal interface material (TIM)
is to fill the microscopic air pockets that are created between
the base of the heat sink and the CPU die due to minor imperfections
in the base, the die or sometimes both.

No TIM Used

TIM Used
The base finish of most modern heat sinks has
improved dramatically over recent years meaning heat transfer
is more efficient and so the influence of the TIM becomes less
pronounced. In theory the poorer the base of your HSF the more
dramatic will be the impact of using a high quality grease over
a poorer one and it's testament to manufacturers that I didn't
have an HSF to hand that could really be desribed as "poor".
To complicate the matter I'm now using the new Thoroughbred
core 2400+ in our test rig which has taken away the detail etching
from the die surface so even this is flatter and smoother than
it was. All these factors conspire to make the differences between
one TIM and another much smaller than it might be with less
expensive sinks or with pre Thoroughbred CPUs.
Synthetic Performance :
The synthetic testing was done with the compounds
straight from the tube with no settling in or "burn-in"
time. Heat was increased steadily over a period of five minutes
and an Akasa AK821 was used for cooling as it offered reasonable
cooling levels without being too aggressive. All temperatures
were taken using a digital thermometer with a flat thermal probe..


As the heat first begins to accumulate at the
1 minute period it's neck and neck between the Nanotherm Silver
and EXP but as temperatures begin to rise we see the Silver
pull ahead quite convincingly.
Actual Performance :
For testing real world performance each compound
was applied to the Tbred XP2400+ and then fitted with a Thermalright
SLK800 heatsink and run for three days prior to benchmarking.
To get things cooking nicely Hot
CPU Tester Pro 3 was run for a full hour while idle temperatures
were taken after 15 minutes running while booted to the BIOS.
As with the synthetic tests temp[eratures were monitored using
a thermal probe as the motherboard in our test system currently
doesn't support monitoring from the thermal diode.

Here we see a reversal in fortunes as the Nanothern
EXP takes the performance trophy with the Nanotherm Silver following
close behind. In all honesty I'm not used to seeing large variations
in TIM performance and I was expecting a spread from best to
worst of little more than a degree or so. Even with synthetic
testing there are a lot of variables that can alter how any
given compound will perform under any given conditions. Things
like HSF base surface finish, ambient temperatures, heat output,
contact surface area, airflow speed and focus, retaining clip
clamping pressure and more can all factor in to the results
and really do make HSF and TIM testing a fairly imprecise science,
or more accurately a science that only stays true on the system
and in the room where the original testing was performed. That
doesn't however mean that direct comparisons can't be made under
test conditions and based on this it seems that Nanotherm Silver
and EXP are set to lead from the front beating ASII (and the
small amount of ASIII I had left) in some style.
Conclusion :
If you've ever spoken to Scott from ESG Associates
you'll know that he eats, sleeps and breathes cooling and is
forever tweaking and refining his compounds until things are
the very best they can be. ESG took a chance with Nanotherm
trying to offer a revolutionary new compound into an industry
well and truly sewn up by Arctic Silver and though the first
formulation was a fraction behind the newer Arctic Silver formulations
in performance it was infinitely easier to work with and to
clean up. Nanotherm II however has improved the performance
while remaining simply the easiest TIM on the market to apply
and remove. With Nanotherm Silver ESG have once again made a
justified claim for the thermal grease crown with a compound
that not only outperforms ASII and III, it also remains incredibly
easy to clean off your processor when the need arises.
Scott tells me that they're just waiting for the
arrival of the finished retail labels before they start to ship
so you should find stocks of Nanotherm Silver XTC begin to filter
through to the channels by late November. The secretive Nanotherm
EXP should be launched around December time though this is tentative
at the moment. Either way we should see it available early 2003
along with more details about its formulation.
I really want to hand this product an editor's
choice but while I'm confident that NS XTC is outperforming
the competition I'm not confident that we can accurately demonstrate
by how much. What is clear is that I need to do a bit of brainstorming
and design and build a test setup capable of accurate, repeatable
and unquestionable results. If you have any ideas or represent
a company or an industry who may be able to help in this regard
please contact
me.

<<<
Back to Review Index >>>
Home