|
Intel
Pentium 4 2.2A (Northwood)
|
|
Author : Wayne
Date : 4th March 2002
|
| ...Product |
Pentium4 2.2A |
| ...Manufacturer |
Intel |
| ...Supplier |
Intel |
| ...Price |
£557.00
approx @ Scan |

Performance :
Test system 1 :
Intel Pentium 4 Northwood 2.2GHz
Shuttle AK40R VIA P4X255 (DDR) Motherboards
256MB Kingmax PC2100 DDR Memory
Creative Labs GeForce 3 Ti500
Fujitsu 40GB ATA-100 HDD
Test system 2 :
AMD Athlon XP2000+
Epox 8KHA+ VIA KT266A (DDR) Motherboards
256MB Kingmax PC2100 DDR Memory
Creative Labs GeForce 3 Ti500
Fujitsu 40GB ATA-100 HDD

Sysmark2001 :
Much like Content Creation 2002, Sysmark offers
results based on actual office productivity and Internet content
creation scenarios. The benchmark is script based and uses a
variety of applications such as Office2000, Dreamweaver 4, Photoshop
6 and Flash 5 in a realistic, multi-tasking environment to simulate
real world usage.
Again we see the Pentium 4's striking ability
to cut through some of the most used applications on the market
today. As I mentioned in an earlier review it's been said that
Sysmark is biased towards Intel processors but purely based
on the way this benchmark works, simulating a "day in the
life" of a Web content creator and office user it would
be hard to see how that could be the case.

Video2000 :
MadOnion.com's Video2000 is a great way of determining
video performance on a variety of graphics chips testing DVD
playback, video editing and MPEG encoding but as we're not looking
at graphics cards I'll only be looking at the MPEG encoding
portion of the results.
This results goes in favor of the Athlon but I
think we need to remember that Video2000 is now a relatively
old software suite written around DirectX 7. I did a variety
of tests using FlasK MPEG 6.0 coupled with the latest DivX 4.12
codecs and in almost every case the Northwood blitzed the AthlonXP.
The reason I'm not publishing those results is due to the fact
that I lack the technical know-how to be certain my results
are accurate, particularly with the number of optimised and
tweaked versions that were available on various sites. Although
6.0 is optimised for SSE2 in addition to MMX and 3DNow, I have
no plans of putting my foot in my mouth in the way a certain
other site did by either using wrong settings or wrong executables
so you'll just have to take my word for the fact that I ran
the standard version using the latest codecs I could find and
the Northwood stormed through the tests. Maybe when I get a
bit more savvy with the various configurations I'll feel confident
enough to post some results but at the moment I'm still climbing
that particular learning curve.

<<<
Back to Review Index | Next
Page, Overclocking and Conclusion>>>
Home
1 :: 2
:: 3 :: 4
:: 5 :: 6
:: 7 :: 8